Julian Assange has secured the right to appeal his extradition to the United States, as ruled by London’s High Court. This decision marks a crucial moment in Assange’s prolonged legal battle against extradition, which could see him facing serious charges in the U.S. if convicted.
Outside the court, dozens of supporters celebrated the legal victory for the WikiLeaks founder. Some beat drums and chanted slogans like “drop the case,” while others held signs demanding, “Let him go Joe,” directed at U.S. President Joe Biden.
During Monday’s hearing, Assange’s legal team argued that U.S. assurances regarding his rights under the First Amendment were insufficient. They contended that Assange, an Australian-born foreign national, could face discrimination if extradited. Judges Victoria Sharp and Jeremy Johnson agreed, allowing a full appeal on issues concerning freedom of speech and nationality.
No date has been set for the next hearing. Assange, 52, is wanted by U.S. authorities on espionage charges linked to WikiLeaks’ publication of classified documents in 2010 and 2011. Conviction could mean life imprisonment for him.
Victory Sparks Mixed Emotions
Stella Assange, Julian’s wife, expressed relief at the court’s decision, calling it a turning point. She criticized the U.S. case as an attack on democratic principles and journalists’ rights worldwide. “How long can this go on for?” she asked, highlighting the prolonged nature of the legal battle.
Activist Redde Jean-Baptiste, speaking to CNN, mentioned the immense pressure on Assange, describing his situation as torturous. The latest ruling offers a glimpse of hope for Assange and his supporters.
In March, the court delayed its decision, seeking assurances on First Amendment protections and the death penalty. The U.S. has since assured that Assange would not face the death penalty if extradited.
Assange has not lived freely for 12 years, spending five years in London’s Belmarsh prison and nearly seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy to avoid arrest. He claims his extradition is politically motivated.
Alan Rusbridger, editor of Prospect Magazine and former Guardian editor-in-chief, described his collaboration with Assange as groundbreaking despite being challenging. Rusbridger views the U.S. case as an attempt to punish whistleblowers and deter investigative journalism.
No comments: